It was fascinating to look for Thalberg’s tomb in Naples Monumental Cemetery especially after hearing Mark Viner’s live performances and recordings of Thalberg.It is one of the most imposing of Chapels in an overcrowded cemetery of what were once some extraordinary monuments to greatly admired people.They are now very sadly neglected as indeed is the city of Naples itself.But Naples and its Poggioreale Cemetery are remarkable vibrant places full of atmosphere and as such are quite unique.I was reminded today of Highgate Cemetery and of the grave next to Karl Marx that Doreen Davis,who passed away last year had asked me to look after. That of Shura Cherkassky.
And so it was interesting to delve into the archive and find out who Thalberg was – this is what I found:
Robbers desecrate Thalberg’s grave
6:10, 20th August 2017
The Italian newspaper Il Mattino recently ran a story with the headline ‘Raid on Naples cemetery: tomb of the composer Thalberg desecrated’.
When Sigismond Thalberg died in April 1871, his wife Francesca Lablanche built a mausoleum to house his remains in Naples’ Poggioreale cemetery. It is close to the graves of Mercadante and Donizetti, an impressive structure befitting the son of an Austrian aristocrat who became one of the greatest piano virtuosos of the day. Thalberg’s embalmed body was placed in a glass coffin and wrapped in an ermine cape, a gift from the Tsar of Russia.
Within a few days of his interment, the lid of the glass coffin had been raised and the ermine cape stolen. Pianist Francesco Nicolosi, president of Sigismund Thalberg International Study Centre, says ‘this led to the end of the embalming, and Thalberg’s body from that moment became petrified’. Now, nearly 150 years later, robbers have again vandalised his sepulchre, forcing the front door and a second gate, and smashing the marble floor with a pickaxe in order to reach the underground tomb. Marble and lead seem to have been the target, as well as the valuable brass that held the structure of the glass coffin in place. Worst of all, Thalberg’s body had been plucked from its resting place and thrown into a corner.
Renata and Giulia Ferrara Pignatelli, daughters of Princess Francesca Ferrara Pignatelli, are Thalberg’s great-great granddaughters. Donna Renata says that it was her sister Giulia and Francesco Nicolosi who made the discovery when they visited to check if the cleaning of the external walls of the tomb had been done.
British virtuoso Mark Viner, today’s leading champion of Thalberg, reacted with a mixture of sadness and shock. ‘The desecration of any grave is an outrage on any level,’ he says, ‘but during the arduous process of preparing the music for performance and recording, these distant names become close acquaintances. I think this comes close to explaining my feeling of real pain and sadness.’
Thanks to the generosity of Donna Giulia, the tomb and mausoleum have now been restored and Thalberg’s body has been placed in a new glass coffin. ‘Before closing the new lid,’ says Nicolosi, ‘I made visible Thalberg’s hand that was previously covered by a blanket.’
Thalberg’s tomb can be visited by appointment. Write to the Sigismund Thalberg International Study Centre at email@example.com
Sigismond Thalberg (8 January 1812 – 27 April 1871) was a composer and one of the most distinguished virtuoso pianists of the 19th century.
Sigismond Thalberg was born in Pâquis near Geneva, Switzerland, on 8 January 1812. According to legend, he was the illegitimate son of Prince Moritz Dietrichstein and Baroness Maria Julia Wetzlar von Plankenstern. However, according to his birth certificate , he was the son of Joseph Thalberg and Fortunée Stein who were both from Frankfurt-am-Main.
Little is known about Thalberg’s childhood and early youth. It is possible that his mother had brought him to Vienna at the age of 10 (the same year in which the 10-year-old Franz Liszt arrived there with his parents). According to Thalberg’s own account, he attended the first performance of Beethoven’s 9th Symphony on 7 May 1824 in the Karntnerthortheater.
There is no evidence as to Thalberg’s early teachers. Baroness von Wetzlar, his mother, who according to Wurzbach was occupied with his education during his childhood and early youth, was a brilliant amateur pianist. It may be therefore that she gave him his first instruction at the piano.
Sigismond Thalberg, 1826.
In spring 1826 Thalberg studied with Ignaz Mascheles in London. Moscheles, according to a letter to Felix Mendelssohn of 14 August 1836, had the impression that Thalberg had already reached a level at which no further help would be needed in order to become a great artist.Thalberg’s first public performance in London was on 17 May 1826. In Vienna on 6 April 1827 he played the first movement, and on 6 May 1827 the Adagio and the Rondo of Hummel’s concerto in B Minor. After this, Thalberg performed regularly in Vienna. His repertoire was mainly classical, including concertos by Hummel and Beethoven. He also performed chamber music. In the year 1828 his Op. 1, a fantasy on melodies from Carl Maria von Weber’s Euryanthe, was published.
In 1830 Thalberg met Mendelssohn and Frederic Chopin in Vienna. Their letters show their opinion that Thalberg’s main strength was his astonishing technical skills. Further information can be found in the diary of the 10-year old Clara Wieck. She had heard Thalberg on 14 May 1830 at a concert which he gave in the theatre of Leipzig. He had played his own Piano Concerto op.5 and a fantasy of his own. Two days before, Clara had played the first solo of the 2nd Concerto of John Field to him, and, together with him, the first movement of a four handed Sonata of Hummel. Her diary, edited by her father Friedrich Wieck, notes Thalberg as “very accomplished”. His playing was clear and precise, also very strong and expressive.
In the early 1830s Thalberg studied counterpoint under Simon Sechter. As a result, passages of canon and fugue can be found in some of Thalberg’s fantasies of this time. An example is his Fantasy, Op. 12, on melodies from Bellini’s opera Norma, which contains a march-theme and variations (one of them a canon), and a fugue on a lyrical theme. The fantasy was published in 1834 and became very popular; but on publication, it was criticised by some, for example by Robert Schumann.
Thalberg successfully changed his composing style, reducing the counterpoint. Several works in his new style, among them the Deux Airs russes variés Op.17, were even enthusiastically praised by Schumann.
In November 1835 Thalberg arrived in Paris. He performed on 16 November 1835 at a private concert of the Austrian ambassador Count Rudolph Apponyi. On 24 January 1836 he took part in a concert of the “Society of the Paris Conservatoire concerts”, playing his “Grande fantaisie” op.22. Thalberg was praised by many of the most prominent artists, among them Rossini and Meyerbeer.Chopin didn’t share his fellow artists’ enthusiasm. After hearing Thalberg play, in Vienna, Chopin wrote: “He plays splendidly, but he’s not my man. He’s younger than I and pleases the ladies – makes potpourris on La Muette – produces his piano and forte with the pedal, not the hand – takes tenths as I do octaves and wears diamond shirt studs”.
His début at the Conservatoire concert was in the Revue et Gazette musicale of 31 January 1836, enthusiastically reviewed by Hector Berlioz. The Ménestrel of 13 March 1836 wrote:
Moscheles, Kalkbrenner, Chopin, Liszt and Herz are and will always be for me great artists, but Thalberg is the creator of a new art which I do not know how to compare to anything that existed before him … Thalberg is not only the premier pianist of the world, he is also an extremely distinguished composer.
On 16 April 1836 Thalberg gave his first solo concert in Paris, and the success was again sensational. According to Rudolph Apponyi’s diary, Thalberg made a profit of 10,000 Francs, a sum which no virtuoso had gained before from a single concert.
Liszt had heard of Thalberg’s successes during the winter 1835–36 in Geneva, in spring 1836 in Lyon, and in Paris. In his letter to Marie d’Agoult of 29 April 1836, he compared himself to the exiled Napoleon. In a review of 8 January 1837, in the Revue et Gazette musicale, Liszt controversially denigrated Thalberg’s compositions.
After Thalberg returned to Paris in the beginning of February 1837, a rivalry developed between him and Liszt. On 4 February Thalberg heard Liszt play in concert for the first time in his life. Thalberg was stupefied. While Liszt then gave over a dozen concerts, Thalberg gave only one concert on 12 March 1837 in the Paris Conservatoire, and a further concert on 2 April 1837. In addition, on 31 March 1837, both Liszt and Thalberg played at a benefit concert to raise money for Italian refugees.
In May 1837 Thalberg gave a concert in London, following which The Athenaeum gave an enthusiastic review. Such enthusiasm followed Thalberg throughout the following years. His fantasy op.33 on melodies from Rossini’s opera Moise became one of the most famous concert pieces of the 19th century, and was still praised by Berlioz in his Memoirs (1869). The fantasy was published at end of March 1839 and in May 1839 studied by Clara Wieck who was delighted by it. In 1848 the fantasy was played by Liszt’s daughter Blandine.
After Thalberg’s stay in London in May 1837, he made a first, short tour, giving concerts in several towns in Great Britain, but he became ill and soon returned to Vienna. In spring 1838 he gave concerts in Paris again. A note in the Revue et Gazette musicale of 4 March 1838, shows that Thalberg’s fame had in the meanwhile grown. He was now called “the most famous of our composers”. Thalberg left Paris on 18 April 1838, travelling to Vienna, the very day that Liszt gave there a charity concert for the benefit of the victims of a flood in Hungary. Thalberg invited Liszt for dinner, and the two great pianists dined together on the 28th with Prince Moritz Dietrichstein, who told Liszt, that he was delighted to have “Castor and Pollux” together in his home. During the evening, Thalberg remarked to Liszt with admirable candour : ” In comparison with you, I have never enjoyed more than a succes d’estime in Vienna”. They dined again the next day, after Liszt’s concert on 29 April 1838. Liszt and Thalberg were both dinner guests of Metternich. During Liszt’s stay in Vienna Thalberg did not perform at all.
In October 1838 Thalberg became acquainted with Robert Schumann. According to Schumann’s diary, Thalberg played from memory etudes by Chopin, Joseph Cristof Kessler and Ferdinand Hiller. He also played with great skill and inspiration works by Beethoven, Schubert and Dussek, as well as Schumann’s Kreisleriana, Op. 16 at sight. On 27 November 1838 Thalberg took part in a charity concert, playing his new fantasy, Op. 40, on melodies from Rossini’s opera La Donna del Lago (“The Lady of the Lake” after Walter Scott). At one of his own “Farewell concerts” on 1 December 1838, he played three of his Etudes, Op. 26, his fantasy, Op. 33 on “Moïse” and his Souvenir de Beethoven, Op. 39, a fantasy on melodies from Ludwig van Beethoven’s symphonies. As a result, in the Neue Zeitschrift fur Musik of 8 March 1839, an enthusiastic review by Schumann of the second book of Thalberg’s Etudes, Op. 26 appeared, concluding “He is a God when sitting at the piano.”
After Thalberg’s “Farewell concert” in Vienna, he began his first extended European tour. On 19 and 21 December 1838 he gave two concerts in Dresden, and he performed twice at the Court. Receiving honours from the King of Saxony, he told him “Wait until you have heard Liszt!” In Leipzig he gave a concert on 28 December 1838, attended by Mendelssohn who on the following day, in a letter to his sister Fanny gave an enthusiastic account. Mendelssohn became a friend and admirer of Thalberg.
After a second concert in Leipzig on 30 December 1838, Thalberg travelled to Berlin, to give a series of concerts there. Via Danzig, Mitau and other places he performed at St.Petersburg, receiving excellent reviews. From St. Petersburg he went on a steamboat to London where he gave further concerts. He then journeyed to Brussels, to meet his friend the violinist Charles de Bériot .There he gave several private performances.
After Brussels, Thalberg arrived in the Rhineland, where he gave a series of concerts with Bériot. He returned to London at the beginning of February 1840, and then travelled from London to Paris together with Baroness Wetzlar, his mother, awaiting the arrival of Liszt.
Thalberg had already announced in December 1838, during his stay in Leipzig, that he would take time off at the end of his tour, and did not perform at any concert during his stay in spring 1840 in Paris.
At this time Mendelssohn, after meeting Liszt, compared him to Thalberg in a letter to his mother:
Thalberg, with his composure, and within his more restricted sphere, is more nearly perfect as a real virtuoso; and after all this is the standard by which Liszt must also be judged, for his compositions are inferior to his playing, and, in fact, are calculated solely for virtuosi.
After the end of the Parisian concert season, Thalberg travelled as tourist in the Rhineland. In the beginning of June 1840 he attended a music festival directed by Louis Spohr in Aachen. He got an invitation from the Russian Tsarina and performed at a court-concert in Ems, but this was his only concert during his stay in the Rhineland. According to a note in the Revue et Gazette musicale of 2 August 1840, p. 410, Thalberg’s friend, the violinist Charles Auguste de Bériot, would get married two days later in Elsene (Ixelles). His bride was a young lady Maria Huber, born in Vienna, from Germany. She was an orphan and had been adopted by Prince von Dietrichstein, Thalberg’s father. It may therefore be presumed that Thalberg wanted to take part in the wedding celebration. During previous visits to the Rhineland he wanted only to relax. He also taught Bériot’s son, the pianist Charles-Wilfrid de Bériot.In the Revue et Gazette musicale of 9 May 1841, an essay by Fétis appeared, ‘Etudes d’exécution transcendente’, in which Liszt was praised for a new composing style which had been stimulated by Thalberg’s challenge. In letters to Fétis of 17 May 1841, and to Simon Löwy of 20 May 1841, Liszt agreed with this analysis.
Thalberg performed in Brussels in fall 1840. He then travelled to Frankfurt-am-Main where he stayed until January 1841. It had been announced that Thalberg would give concerts in Paris again in spring 1841, but he changed his plans. In Frankfurt he only took part in a charity concert on 15 January 1841, playing his fantasies on La Donna del Lago and Les Huguenots He was busily composing new works; his Second Don Giovanni Fantasy op.42 and the fantasy op.51 on Rossini’s Semiramide date from this time.
In the second half of January 1841, Thalberg travelled from Frankfurt to Weimar, where he performed three times at the Grand Duke’s court and also in the Theatre. He then went to Leipzig, where he visited Mendelssohn and Schumann. On 8 February 1841 he gave a solo concert in Leipzig, enthusiastically reviewed by Schumann, playing his ‘Second Don Giovanni Fantasy’ op.42, his ‘Andante final de Lucia di Lammermoor ‘, op.44, his ‘Thême et Etude’ op.45 and his Caprice op.46 on melodies from Bellini’s La Sonnabula.
Clara Schumann noted in her diary:
On Monday Thalberg visited us and played to the delightment beautiful on my piano. An even more accomplished mechanism than his does not exist, and many of his piano effects must ravish the connoisseurs. He does not fail a single note, his passages can be compared to rows of pearls, his octaves are the most beautiful ones I ever heard.
Mendelssohn’s student Horsley wrote of the meeting of his teacher and Thalberg:
We were a trio, and after dinner Mendelssohn asked Thalberg if he had written anything new, whereupon Thalberg sat down to the piano and played his Fantasia from the “Sonnambula” … At the close there are several runs of Chromatique Octaves, which at that time had not previously heard, and of which peculiar passages Thalberg was undoubtedly the inventor. Mendelssohn was much struck with the novel effect produced, and greatly admired its ingenuity … he told me to be with him the next afternoon at 2 o’clock. When I arrived at his study door I heard him playing to himself, and practising continually this passage which had so struck him the previous day. I waited for at least half an hour listening in wonderment to the facility with which he applied his own thoughts to the cleverness of Thalberg’s mechanism, and then went into the room. He laughed and said: ‘Listen to this, is it not almost like Thalberg?’After his stay in Leipzig, Thalberg gave concerts in Breslau and Warsaw. He then travelled to Vienna and gave two successful concerts there. In a review in the Leipziger Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung, Thalberg was described as Liszt’s only rival.
In winter 1841–1842, Thalberg gave concerts in Italy, while Liszt, from end of December 1841 until beginning of March 1842, gave a series of concerts in Berlin. Thalberg matched Liszt’s successes in Berlin. He then returned via Marseilles, Toulon and Dijon, arriving on 11 April 1842, in Paris. On the next day he gave his first, and on 21 April his second concert. According to an account by Berlioz, Thalberg made a profit of 12,000 Francs from his first, and of 13,000 Francs from his second concert. The concerts were reviewed in the Revue et Gazette musicale by Henri Blanchard who two years before, in his review of Liszt’s concert on 20 April 1840, had nominated Thalberg as Cesar, Octavian or Napoleon of the piano. In spring 1842, Blanchard reached for new superlatives even surpassing his former ones. In his review of Thalberg’s second concert he wrote, Thalberg would in 100 years have been canonized, and by all coming pianists be invoked with name of Holy Thalberg. According to the account by Berlioz, at the end of Thalberg’s second concert a golden crown was thrown to the stage.
In addition to his own concerts, Thalberg took part in a concert of Emile Prudent. He then travelled via Brussels to London. Later in 1842 Thalberg was decorated with the Cross of the French Legion of Honour. He travelled to Vienna where he stayed until autumn 1842. In the second half of November until 12 December 1842, he made a further tour in Great Britain, and in January 1843 he returned to Paris. At end of March 1843 he performed at a private concert of Pierre Erard, but this was his only concert appearance during that season.
In March 1843 Heinrich Heine wrote about Thalberg:
His performance is so gentlemanly, so entirely without any forced acting the genius, so entirely without that well-known brashness that makes a poor cover for inner insecurity. Healthy women love him. So do sickly women, even though he does not engage their sympathy by epileptic seizures at the piano, even though he does not play at their overstrung, delicate nerves, even though he neither electrifies them nor galvanizes them.
In winter 1843–44 Thalberg gave concerts in Italy again. At end of March 1844 he returned to Paris, where at the same time also Liszt was expected. Liszt arrived on April 8 and gave on 16 April a first concert, at which he played his Norma-fantasy, published shortly before. When composing his fantasy, Liszt had put many Thalberg-effects to it. In his later years, he told August Göllerich, one of his pupils:
As I met Thalberg, I said to him: ‘Here I have cribbed everything from you.’ ‘Yes,’ he replied, ‘there are Thalberg-passages included which are indeed indecent.’
Shortly after Liszt’s concert on 11 May 1844, Thalberg left Paris. He travelled to London and gave a concert there on 28 May 1844. At a further concert in London he played a concerto for three pianos by J.S. Bach together with Moscheles and Mendelssohn. He also took part in a concert of Jules Benedict. In August 1844 he returned to Paris where he stayed until 1845. During the winter 1844–45 he gave a piano course for selected students at the Paris Conservatoire. On April 2, 1845, he gave a concert in Paris, playing his fantasies op.63 on Rossini’s Barber if Seville, op.67 on Donizetti’s Don Pasquale and op.52 on Aubert’s La Muette de Portici, as well as his ‘Marche funèbre variée’ op.59 and the ‘Barcarolle’ op.60.
In spring 1848, in Vienna, Liszt met Thalberg once more. On 3 May 1848 Thalberg gave a benefit concert which Liszt attended. According to an account by his pupil Nepomuk Dunkl, Liszt was sitting on the stage, carefully listening and loudly applauding. It was 11 years since he had first heard his rival’s playing.
On 22 July 1843 Thalberg married Francesca (“Cecchina”), the eldest daughter of Luigi Lablache, first bass at the Théâtre des Italiens in Paris. Thalberg went with his wife to Italy where they stayed for the winter 1843–44.
In 1855, after Thalberg’s operas Florinda and Cristina di Svezia had failed, he realized his ambition to give concerts in America. From July to December 1855 he performed with overwhelming success in Rio de Janeiro and Buenos Aires. He returned to Europe, but after a stay of several months in Paris went on the steamboat Africa to North America, where he arrived on 3 October 1856, in New York. After Thalberg’s debut there on 10 November 1856, a performance marathon ensued, during which he spent eight months giving concerts 5 or 6 days a week. Occasionally he gave two or even three concerts a day. On Sundays, concerts were generally only allowed if they presented “sacred music”, but several times Thalberg performed anyhow, playing pieces like his Moïse-fantasy, based on a prayer from Rossini’s opera, or his Huguenots-fantasy with the chorale “Ein feste Burg ist unser Gott” as main subject. His Andante op. 32 and the Marche funèbre varié op. 59 were also allowed.
Thalberg’s first American season ended with a concert on 29 July 1857 in Saratoga Springs NY. On 15 September 1857 he gave another concert in New York, starting his second season. With very few intermissions he was busy until his last concert on 12 June 1858, in Peoria, IL. By then he had visited nearly 80 cities and given more than 320 regular concerts in the United States and 20 concerts in Canada. In addition, he gave at least twenty free concerts for many thousands of schoolchildren. Thalberg also gave a series of solo matinees in New York and Boston at which he played own works as well as chamber music. From 1857, the violinist Henri Vieuxtemps toured with Thalberg. They played works by Beethoven, and Duos composed by Thalberg.
Thalberg’s financial success on these tours was immense. He got an average of about $500 per concert and probably made more than $150,000 during his two seasons, the equivalent today of about $3 million. A large part of his appeal on these tours was his unpretentious and unassuming personality; he did not resort to advertising gimmicks or cheap crowd-pleasing tricks, instead offering superbly polished renditions of his own compositions, which had already been well known in America. On rising from the piano, he was always the same quiet, respectable, self-possessed, middle-aged gentleman that he was at the dinner table of his hotel. He played works byBeethoven, among them the sonatas op. 27 no. 2 (“Moonlight”) and op.26 (“Funeral March”) as well as the first movements of the Third and Fifth Piano Concertos. His cadenza to Beethoven’s third concerto was admired. He also played works by Bach,Chopin, Hummel, Mendelssohn and several other composers. The New-York Musical Review and Gazette of July 24, 1858, wrote:
Thalberg … quite unexpectedly closed what has been a most brilliant career – completely successful, musically, giving to the talented and genial artist abundance of both fame and money. There is probably not another virtuoso, whether with instrument or voice (Liszt alone excepted), who could have excited a moiety of the enthusiasm, or gathered a fragment of the dollars, which Thalberg has excited and gathered.
The “unexpected close” referred to the announcement in June 1858 in Chicago that Thalberg would make only one of three scheduled appearances before immediately returning to Europe. In fact, Thalberg did not even perform at that concert, but very hastily left. His wife had arrived from Europe, following reports that Thalberg had an extra-marital liaison.
The true reason why Francesca Thalberg had left for America in June 1858 and shortly afterwards, together with her husband, very hastily returned to Europe is unknown. The death of Thalberg’s father in law, Lablache, on 23 January 1858, could be one reason. A further possibility is that there may have been consideration of legitimizing Thalberg to enable him to succeed his natural father Prince Franz Joseph von Dietrichstein.
After Thalberg’s return to Europe, he settled in Posillipo near Naples in a villa, which had belonged to Lablache. For the following four years Thalberg lived in silence there. In spring 1862 he gave concerts in Paris and London once again and was as successful as ever. After a last tour in Brazil in 1863 he put an end to his career. He suggested taking a position as piano professor at the conservatory in Naples, but it was defeated since an Italian nationality would be necessary. One year later he got an offer from the same conservatory which he refused. Vitale’s claim that he published instructive editions of J.S. Bach’s “Well Tempered Clavier” and Muzio Clementi’s “Gradus ad Parnassum” has been recently disputed by Chiara Bertoglio. When he died on 27 April 1871 he left behind a collection of many hundreds of autographs by famous composers, among them Bach, Handel, Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven, Schubert and others, even Liszt. The collection was sold after Thalberg’s death. He is buried at Nuovo Cemetery in Napoli (Naples) Italy in the Doganella section of Naples
Sigismond Thalberg was one of the most famous and most successful piano composers of the 19th century. During the 1830s and the 1840s his style was a major force in European piano-playing. He was greatly in fashion and was imitated by others. In 1852, Wilhelm von Lenz wrote:
‘The piano playing of the present day, to tell the truth, consists only of Thalberg simple, Thalberg amended, and Thalberg exaggerated; scratch what is written for the piano, and you will find Thalberg.’
Ten years later, in 1862, a London correspondent of the Revue et Gazette Musicale wrote:
‘Nobody in fact has been so much imitated; his manner has been parodied, exaggerated, twisted, tortured, and it may have happened more than once to all of us to curse this Thalbergian school’.
Expressions like “exaggerated”, “twisted” and “tortured” indicate that some contemporaries were starting to feel jaded of his style. It was at this time when Thalberg’s career as composer and as virtuoso came to an end.
In the late 19th century, Thalberg’s fame had come to depend on his association with a single piano technique, the ‘three-hand effect’. Carl Friedrich Weitzmann, in his Geschichte des Klavierspiels (1879), wrote about this.
‘His bravura pieces, fantasies on melodies from Rossini’s Mosè and La donna del lago on motifs fromBellini’s Norma and on Russian folk-songs, became extraordinarily popular through his own, brilliant execution; however, they treat their subjects always in one and the same way, [namely] … to let the tones of a melody be played in the medium octave of the keyboard now by the thumb of the right, now of the left hand, while the rest of the fingers are executing arpeggios filling the whole range of the keyboard’.
In a review in the Revue et gazette musicale the finale of Thalberg’s Mosè fantasy is described as follows
‘it consists of a principal melody on the strings in the medium of the instrument, played alternately by both thumbs, while both hands are traversing with rapid arpeggios the whole range of the keyboard.’
It is not a difficult trick, and it sounds (and looks) much harder than it is, but it was new in the 1830s and it caused a sensation. Audiences were entranced, and would rise up from their seats to see how Thalberg did it.
While Thalberg was still in Vienna, in the Revue et Gazette musicale of 8 January 1837, Liszt’s review of some of Thalberg’s piano works appeared. Liszt claimed that in the Grande fantaisie op.22 the left hand continually played arpeggios and nothing else. The description was polemic, since in large parts of the piece the left hand plays a variety of firms: but thumb-melodies were not mentioned by Liszt.
In response to Liszt’s review, in his essay “MM. Thalberg et Liszt”‘ in the Revue et Gazette musicale of 23 April 1837, Fétis claimed that Thalberg had created a new piano-style by uniting two different schools. While playing brilliant passages, Thalberg simultaneously executed a singing melody. Liszt, in his reply in the Revue et Gazette musicale of 14 May 1837, wrote:
‘Posing M. Thalberg as representative of a new school! Apparently the school of arpeggios and thumb-melodies? Who would admit that this was a school, and even a new school? Arpeggios and thumbs-melodies have been played before M. Thalberg, and they will be played after M. Thalberg again.’
Fétis protested against Liszt’s insinuation. He played for the first time his Mosè fantasy. The audience noted a magical effect. They could see that in the finale Thalberg was playing a bass and accompanying with his left hand. His right hand was busily occupied with rapid arpeggios. But in addition, a broad melody was to be heard. Liszt’s explanation of the thumb-melodies was accurate. This characterization of his style followed him until the end of his life.
Thalberg by the late 19th century was often only characterised as “Old Arpeggio”; his musical innovations were unrecognised or had been forgotten. Others were tempted by the successes of Thalberg’s works to inundate the musical world with imitations ad nauseam. In the end his reputation was submerged by the trivial productions of his imitators.