It was clear from the very first notes of this early Mozart Sonata that we were in the hands of a real artist.A refined tone palette of clarity and style with ornaments that sparkled like jewels with delicate precision.But this was no clock work precision because every note spoke so eloquently with a subtle sense of rubato that was both enticing and ravishingly beautiful.Rests and pauses that were as eloquent as the notes that came before and after in a musical conversation that brought this sonata vividly to life .An exquisite Andante cantabile with a kaleidoscopic range of sounds like the human voice where the ending was pure whispered magic.The brilliance of the Allegretto was tempered with elegance and style where everything was given the just time to breathe with delicate and delectable ornaments that just added to the civilised dance of its age.

And style there certainly was in Kreisler’s Liebesleid in the beguiling transcription by Rachmaninov.We just held our breath as Pedro placed the notes with daring timelessness.It was as though he was improvising such was the spontaneity of invention as we followed hypnotically his every move.Scales and ornaments that were like streams of gold and silver just adding a glow to the delectable old style Viennese waltz that Kreisler had invented with such charm and grace.It was the same charm and grace as Kreisler’s golden toned violin but with the unmistakeable harmonies of his friend Rachmaninov.Two great artists but there is a saying that there are never two without three and the third was sharing with us tonight his refined artistry and bringing us again the magic of this old world bonbon.

We were immediately taken into a different world with the dynamic drive of De Fallas’s Fantasia Bética.The savage excitement of Andalusia with it’s constant changing of character.Glissandi and swirls of notes gave way to an almost inaudible murmuring of atmospheric sounds.Pointing his finger to a note that shone like a jewel in the mists of sound.A note that then became an anguished cry as Pedro knew how to illuminate the piano with ravishing vehemence.The final notes placed deep in the piano with an downturned left hand thumb pummelling with savagery a note that was to be joined by the right hand in a stand up fight as Pedro brought this fantasy to its ultimate exciting close.

Peace was restored with the charm of Soler’s G minor Sonata that like with Mozart,Pedro played with elegance and style with an exquisite range of colours.Even the scintillating brilliance of it’s twin in D major was shaped with the beauty that only a true musician could find in seemless scales and arpeggios.

It was in Chopin’s Sonata op 35 that Pedro showed us what real artistry can mean. It transformed Chopin’s well worn masterpiece into a living thing as though the ink was still wet on the page.Such was his musicianship and sensitivity that the monumental opening was quite overwhelming as the opening chords immediately became a whispered living wave on which Chopin places his gasping fragmented melody that will be transformed with menace and grandeur in the development.This was a performance of aristocratic musicianship where there was a rubato that was so imperceptible and with such refined good taste that even the second subject was allowed to breath and speak so naturally.I was missing the weight of a Rubinstein or Perlemuter but Pedro’s ravishingly beautiful playing allowed the counterpoints to be an integral part of this beautiful melody in a way that was totally new to be and so convincing.Like many great pianists Pedro ignored the much debated repeat and entered the mysteriously menacing world of the development.Chopin’s genius allowing the opening Grave to combine with the doppio movimento in an outpouring of aristocratic grandiloquence .In Pedro’s hands it was breathtaking for its passionate sweep but above all for the sumptuous beauty and fullness without any hardness that he coaxed out of this magnificent Steinway concert grand.I have never heard the ending of this movement played with such passionate control. Chopin marks accelerando on the final bars but Pedro realised that this was more an inner intensity than a helter skelter race to the finish! The scherzo that follows was played with fantasy and again scales that became washes of sound played with enviable precision.It was Rosalyn Tureck who once said that she did not play wrong notes- meaning that every note has a significance and is an essential link in a chain.A sentence where every word has it just weight and meaning – an artist who paints a picture in sound.In Pedro’s hands today I heard the Trio as if for the first time such was the wondrous artistry of counterpoints that were whispered with magical golden clarity and with an improvised freedom.In lesser hands this would have broken the overall architectural shape but Pedro managed to hold us in his spell as I have rarely heard before.The final two drops in the ocean at the end were followed by a silence that held us all with baited breath as he took his time before playing the relentless left hand march with unusual pointed colour.The Funeral March was allowed to float on these constant and unflinching steps.A trio that was whispered and drew us in to eavesdrop on such intimacy.An extraordinary control of sound where every note was a perfect gem and even the hint of passion before the end just made the entry of the Funeral march even more poignant than before.A last movement that was indeed like a wind blowing over the graves .But within this perpetuum mobile of washes of sounds there was a heartbeat that was revealed through the mist with devastating effect and searing intensity as the wind howled all around before the final triumphant flame that brings this masterpiece to it’s conclusion.

After such a monumental performance our young Spanish prince offered us a scintillating performance of Lecuona’s Malagueña where his style ,colour and even showmanship all came together in an exhilarating outpouring of this famous Cuban showpiece.

 

Mozart’s Piano Sonata No. 10 K.330 / 300h, is one of the three works in the cycle of sonatas K.330-331 – 332. The sonata was composed in 1783 when Mozart was 27 years old and was published, with the other two sonatas by Artaria in 1784. There are three movements :

1. Allegro moderato
2. Andante cantabile in F major
3. Allegretto

It was probably written in 1783, either in Vienna, or during the course of Mozart’s first visit home to Salzburg, bringing with him a wife of whom his fatherstrongly disapproved. It is clearly one of the sonatas mentioned by the composer in a letter to his father written in June 1784, identified with K. 330, K. 331 and K. 332, and now sent for publication to Artaria, but already known to his sister.Mozart repeatedly mentioned piano sonatas in his correspondence of the years 1778–1783, but he most likely never alluded to the three Sonatas K. 330 – 332. It is not until June 1784 that we find an unequivocal mention of these three works. It is Mozart’s communication to his father that he had “given Artaria, to engrave, the three sonatas for clavier only, which I once sent to my sister, the first in C, the second in A, and the third in f.” The printing progressed quickly, and on 25 August of that year the WIENER ZEITUNG advertised the pieces with the words: “The following new publications can be purchased from the art dealers Artaria Comp. …:
“Three clavier sonatas, Opus 6, by Herr Kapellmeister Mozart, 2 fl. 30 kr.” The three sonatas are indeed designated as “Op. VI” in the title of the first edition. As occurs frequently in prints by Artaria, this edition contains a considerable amount of inaccuracies and errors in all three sonatas; nevertheless, it remains an important source as it features a number of dynamic markings that are not found in the surviving autograph but which had most likely been added by Mozart in the lost engraver’s master.

Alt-Wiener Tanzweisen (Old Viennese Melodies ) is a set of three short pieces for violin and piano composed by Austrian-American violinist Fritz Kreisler .The three pieces are titled Liebesfreud (Love’s Joy), Liebesleid (Love’s Sorrow), and Schön Rosmarin (Lovely Rosemary).

The legendary violinist Fritz Kreisler and Sergei Rachmaninov performed frequently together. On one occasion, as the story goes, Kreisler had a memory slip during a performance. Fumbling around the fingerboard and attempting to improvise his way out of the predicament, he inched his way towards the piano, whispering helplessly, “Where are we?” Rachmaninov answered, “In Carnegie Hall.”

As a tribute to their friendship, Rachmaninov created piano arrangements of three of Kreisler’s violin miniatures, including Liebesleid (“Love’s Sorrow”), and Liebesfreud (“Love’s Joy”). Kreisler’s original compositions are charming slices of pre-war Vienna. In Rachmaninov’s hands they become thrilling new music…variations on the original themes, infused with Rachmaninov’s distinct sound and spirit.

It is not known when the pieces are written, but they were published in 1905, deliberately misattributed to Joseph LannerKreisler often played these pieces as encores at his concerts, though the pieces are usually performed separately. In 1911, he published solo piano arrangements of the pieces as Alt-Wiener Tanzweisen and they have since appeared in numerous settings for other instruments, or orchestrated.

Two of the pieces, Liebesfreud and Liebesleid, were the subject of virtuoso transcriptions for solo piano by Kreisler’s friend Sergei Rachmaninov  (1931),who also recorded these transcriptions.

Someone said to Rachmaninov that this transcription seemed difficult. Rachmaninoff replied, “Difficult! It is impossible!”

Here is Rachmaninov :https://youtube.com/watch?v=gGmILVnE_dg&feature=shared

Here is Kreisler: https://youtube.com/watch?v=gGmILVnE_dg&feature=shared

Fantasía bética, or Andalusian Fantasy, was written by in 1919 evoking the old Roman province of Baetis in southern Spain, today’s Andalusia. It was commissioned by Artur Rubinstein ,who planned to perform it in Barcelona that year but did not learn it in time and so wound up giving the premiere in New York on 20 February 1920; as it turned out, he would play it only a few times before dropping it from his repertory without recording it and years later he explained to the composer that he found it too long … It was Falla’s last major piano work and the only one that belongs to the virtuoso tradition in which Falla the pianist had been trained. ‘Guitar figurations transformed into pianistic terms abound … other passages evoke the harpsichord, Scarlatti as it were, rewritten by Bartók.’ Beyond that are the smoky, heavily ornamented lines of flamenco singers and the tightly controlled gestures of Andalusian dancing, the whole work adding up to a marvellously varied and vigorous portrait of Spain. From the structural point of view Falla’s ‘internal rhythm’, which he explained as ‘the harmony in the deepest sense of the word born of the dynamic equilibrium between the sections’. Any attempt to shorten the work would have blunted its impact.

The abstract, large-scale work is a celebration of Andalusian culture and history, but not an historical evocation. Its influences draw from Falla’s knowledge and experience of the the flamenco culture that evolved in Andalusia.

Provinicia Baetica was the old Roman name for Andalusia and so a translation of the title might be “Andalusian Fantasy.” Although the materials used are original with Falla, they strongly evoke the folk music of southern Spain: 
the strident, sombre cante jondo sung in oriental-sounding scales, chords derived from guitar tunings, and a harsh percussive quality reminiscent of castanets and heel stamping. 

The tonal originality of the Baetica is a result of Gypsy, ‘Middle Eastern’, Sephardic, Indian and subtle French influences woven into the harmonic language. 

Manuel de Falla was born in 1876 into a reasonably affluent family in Cádiz, where music was confined to annual performances of Haydn’s The Seven Last Words, occasional visits by grand opera companies, and folk songs—not as museum pieces, but as living elements of Spanish life. By 1896 the family fortunes had diminished and they moved to Madrid, where Falla entered the conservatoire and began to compose zarzuelas, the Spanish form of operetta. But his eyes were set on Paris and in 1907 he began a seven-year stay, making friends with Debussy, Ravel and Dukas. He had already begun the Cuatro piezas españolas in Madrid, but they were brought out in 1909 by the Parisian publisher Durand on the recommendation of the three above-named composers. Despite the obvious debt to Albéniz, also in Paris at the time and the dedicatee of the pieces, Falla’s mixture of harmonic invention and elegant counterpoint is unfailingly captivating, banishing any hint of the boredom that might otherwise accrue from the insistent Spanish dance rhythms. His tunes too recall Spanish folk music with its repeated notes and small intervals, but his textures are in general more economical than those of Albéniz.

The opera La vida breve was written in 1904–5 but not performed until 1913. It includes two Spanish dances which have subsequently achieved a life of their own. The first, which opens the second act, was published in a variety of settings, including transcriptions for piano solo and four-hand duet by the composer, and with the music from the end of the scene as Interludio y Danza for orchestra. It was also arranged by Fritz Kreisler for solo violin and piano (as Danza española) in 1926.

Antonio Francisco Javier José Soler Ramos, usually known as Padre Antonio Soler, known in Catalan  as Antoni Soler i Ramos  baptized 3 December 1729 – died 20 December 1783 He is best known for his many mostly one-movement keyboard Sonatas although he composed more than 500 sacred choral musical pieces in his native Spain. Today, though, it is his 200-or-so keyboard sonatas that are arousing the curiosity of performers . In 1761 Soler wrote a music-theory treatise in which he sketched out methods of quickly modulating to remote keys; these techniques are also found in his keyboard sonatas with the subtlety and speed of modulation between keys, and a brilliant lightness occasionally darkened by moments of pathos.Padre Soler’s most celebrated works,the keyboard sonatas, are comparable to those composed by Domenico Scarlatti  (with whom he may have studied) but are more varied in form than those of Scarlatti, with some pieces in three or four movements; Scarlatti’s pieces are in one (mostly) or two movements. Soler’s sonatas were cataloged in the early twentieth century by Fr. Samuel Rubio and so all have ‘R’ numbers assigned.His appointment in 1757 as maestro di capilla and organist at the Escorial, the royal palace established by Philip II of Spain, allowed Antonio Soler to mix with fellow court musicians, among whom was Domenico Scarlatti, whose influence was to remain profound. Soler wrote some 200 sonatas, his greatest compositional memorial, most for the young prince, Don Gabriel. 

This is Pedro playing the Sonata in G minor https://images.app.goo.gl/VkLc7wYWG5Pxwe238

Some time after writing the Marche funèbre,(1837) Chopin composed the other movements of the Sonata op 35 ,completing the entire sonata by 1839. In a letter on 8 August 1839, addressed to Fontana, Chopin wrote:

I am writing here a Sonata in B flat minor which will contain my March which you already know. There is an Allegro, then a Scherzo in E flat minor, the March and a short Finale about three pages of my manuscript-paper. The left hand and the right hand gossip in unison after the March. … My father has written to say that my old sonata [in C minor, Op. 4] has been published by Haslinger and that the German critics praise it. Including the ones in your hands I now have six manuscripts. I’ll see the publishers damned before they get them for nothing.

Haslinger’s unauthorised dissemination of Chopin’s early C minor sonata (he had gone as far as engraving the work and allowing it to circulate, against the composer’s wishes) may have increased the pressure Chopin had to publish a piano sonata, which may explain why Chopin added the other movements to the Marche funèbre to produce a sonata.It was finished in the summer of 1839 in Nohant in France and published in May 1840 in London,Leipzig and Paris.

The sonata comprises four movements:

1. Grave – Doppio movimento
2. Scherzo
3. Marche funèbre: Lento
4. Finale: Presto

The first major criticism, by Schumann , appeared in 1841. He described the sonata as “four of [his] maddest children under the same roof” and found the title “Sonata” capricious and slightly presumptuous.He also remarked that the Marche funèbre “has something repulsive” about it, and that “an adagio in its place, perhaps in D-flat, would have had a far more beautiful effect”.In addition, the finale caused a stir among Schumann and other musicians. Schumann said that the movement “seems more like a mockery than any [sort of] music”,and when Felix Mendelssohn was asked for an opinion of it, he commented, “Oh, I abhor it”. Franz Liszt, a friend of Chopin’s, remarked that the Marche funèbre is “of such penetrating sweetness that we can scarcely deem it of this earth”.It was Anton Rubinstein who said that the fourth movement is the “wind howling around the gravestones”.When the sonata was published in 1840 the London and Paris editions indicated the repeat of the exposition as starting at the very beginning of the movement (at the Grave section). However, the Leipzig edition designed the repeat as beginning at the Doppio movimento section. Although the critical edition published by Breitkopf & Hartel  (that was edited, among others, by Franz Liszt, Carl Reinecke , and Johannes Brahms ) indicate the repeat similarly to the London and Paris first editions, almost all 20th-century editions are similar to the Leipzig edition in this regard with the repeat to the Doppio movimento ,Charles Rosen  argues that the repeat of the exposition in the manner perpetrated by the Leipzig edition is a serious error, saying it is “musically impossible” as it interrupts the D♭ major cadence (which ends the exposition) with the B♭ minor accompanimental figure.Karol Mikuli’s 1880 complete edition of Chopin contained a repeat sign after the Grave in the first movement of the Piano Sonata No. 2. Mikuli was a student of Chopin from 1844 to 1848 and also observed lessons Chopin gave to other students – including those where this sonata was taught – and took extensive notes.Many great artists including Barenboim,Horowitz,Rachmaninoff,Rubinstein,Ohlssohn,Kissin and Pedro tonight exclude the repetition altogether!

Malagueña” is a song by Cuban composer Ernesto Lecuona. It was originally the sixth movement of Lecuona’s Suite Andalucía (1933), to which he added lyrics in Spanish. In general terms, malagueña’s are flamenco  dance styles from Málaga, in the southeast of Spain.The melody that forms the basis of “Malagueña” was not of Lecuona’s invention. It can be heard in 19th-century American composer Louis Moreau Gottschalk’s solo piano composition Souvenirs d’Andalousie Based on Gottschalk’s international renown, it is reasonable to assume Lecuona heard it and either wittingly or unwittingly co-opted it in composing his most famous piece.

Pedro Lopez Salas in Paradise .A standing ovation at La Mortella – The Walton Foundation

Pedro Lopez Salas at St Mary’s -The magic box of colours of a great artist

Pedro Lopez Salas -The style and authority of a great artist -The Keyboard Trust in Florence goes British

Impeccable living Mozart as Queen Bodicea drives her flaming chariot to meet Grieg.Salas,Swigut,Pastuszka and the (Oh!)Orkiestra take Warsaw by storm